A TRS Resourcing guide for employers, HR leaders, and hiring managers.

Look, most flexibility policies fail. And it’s not because the intent is wrong, or because the policy is bad. It’s that the role was never designed for the way it was going to be done. At the end of the day, the problem isn’t the person. It’s the role.

This is a practical guide to getting that design right. It’s drawn from what we see working and failing across our client base, and from what we’ve learned designing roles inside our own business. If you’re thinking about restructuring a role, building flexibility into your next hire, or trying to work out why a previous flexible arrangement didn’t land, this one’s for you.

Start with the role, not the person

The first mistake most businesses make is reverse engineering a flexible role around a specific candidate. Someone they want to keep comes back from parental leave and asks for three days a week. The business agrees, doesn’t change the role, and hopes the person can do the same job in less time.

They almost never can. Not because they’re not capable, but because a role designed for five days doesn’t compress neatly into three. Something gets dropped, and it’s usually the stuff that doesn’t show up in a job description: the relationship building, the proactive work, the strategic thinking. The transactional output stays. The value add disappears.

What you should be doing is stepping back and looking at the role itself. What does this position exist to deliver? Which of those outcomes are essential, and which have just accumulated over time? What could be redistributed, automated, or simply stopped?

Here’s the truth: most full time roles, when you look at them honestly, contain at least a day of work that isn’t really delivering anything. A role redesign is your chance to identify that and get rid of it. That makes flexibility viable for the person doing the job, and it makes the role better for whoever does it next.

Define the non negotiables

Every role has things that can’t flex, and things that can. The mistake is treating them as the same.

Non negotiables might include client facing hours, machinery operation, shift handovers, regulatory requirements, or attendance at specific recurring meetings. These are the structural constraints of the role. You need to name them clearly, upfront, before any conversation about flexibility starts.

Everything else is potentially flexible. It depends on what the business needs and what the person needs. But the conversation only works if both parties know which category each requirement sits in.

Here’s a practical exercise for you. Write down every meeting, deliverable, and recurring task associated with the role. For each one, mark whether it requires a specific time, a specific place, a specific person, or none of the above. The pattern usually surprises people. Most of what feels fixed isn’t, and a much smaller core of time or place bound work emerges.

Get the structure right before you advertise

A flexible role should be designed before it goes to market, not negotiated at offer stage. Candidates can tell the difference between a business that has thought through how a flexible arrangement will work and a business that’s making it up on the fly in response to their request.

Before you advertise, you should be able to answer the following clearly.

• What hours or days is this role available? Be specific. “Some flexibility” tells candidates nothing.
• Who covers the work when this person is not on duty? This is the question most people skip. If the answer is “no one,” the role is poorly designed. Simple as that.
• How will handovers work? Email at end of day, a shared system, a brief overlap with another team member, all of these work. What doesn’t work is leaving it to chance.
• What does success look like? In a flexible role, hours are not a useful measure. Outcomes are. Be explicit about what you’re expecting the person to deliver.
• Who is the manager, and how often will they meet with this person? In a part time or remote arrangement, regular one to ones become more important, not less.

Write the job ad to match

A flexible role advertised vaguely will attract the wrong applicants and put off the right ones. Pretty straightforward.

What you want to do is put the flexible structure of the role in the headline and the opening lines of the ad. “School hours operations coordinator, Melbourne south east” tells the candidate immediately that the role has been designed for someone with parenting commitments. “Operations coordinator, full time, flexible arrangements available for the right person” tells them nothing useful and signals that flexibility is something they’ll have to fight for. Big difference.

Same goes for compressed weeks, job shares, work from home arrangements, and seasonal roles. Be specific in the ad. Candidates self select much better when they know what they’re applying for.

Plan the first 90 days deliberately

New starters in flexible roles need more structured onboarding, not less. The instinct is sometimes the opposite: because the person is part time or remote, the business assumes they can pick it up as they go. They can’t. The total hours available for onboarding are lower, and the informal absorption of knowledge that happens around full time desks just doesn’t happen in the same way.

A good onboarding plan for a flexible role includes a clear list of who the person needs to meet in the first month, a defined set of deliverables for the first 90 days, and explicit guidance on what’s urgent versus what can wait until they’re next in. Without that, the first weeks dissolve into ad hoc questions and the person never builds momentum.

Measure what matters

If you’re going to make flexibility work in your business, you need to be honest about what you’re measuring.

This can require managers to change how they think about their role. A manager who has historically led through visibility, walking the floor, checking in informally, seeing what people are doing, needs to develop a different toolkit. They need to be clear about expectations upfront, set check ins deliberately, and trust that work is happening when they can’t see it.

Flexibility in trades and operational roles

A quick note on the industries we recruit across, because the common assumption is that flexibility doesn’t apply to roles that require physical presence or specific shifts. That’s partly true and largely false.

Genuine constraints exist, no question. A machinery operator can’t run a shift from home. A site supervisor needs to be on site. A warehouse coordinator needs to be there when the trucks are. Fair enough.

But within those constraints, more is possible than employers usually assume. Start and finish times can often shift by an hour either way without operational impact. Compressed weeks work well in many operational settings, especially where production runs on different cycles. Job shares between two part time people can cover roles that don’t suit a single part timer. Some roles have administrative components that can be done from home, even if the operational core can’t.

Here’s what I’ve seen: the businesses winning in the operational labour market right now are the ones thinking harder about this. The businesses still posting standard 7am to 3.30pm roles and wondering why they can’t find people are the ones falling behind.

If a previous flexible arrangement didn’t work

Let me say this clearly: a failed flexible arrangement in the past is not evidence that flexibility doesn’t work. It’s usually evidence that the role design, the manager capability, or the measurement framework wasn’t right.

Before you write off flexibility in your business, look honestly at what went wrong. Was the role properly redesigned, or was the person just asked to do the same job in less time? Did the manager have the support and skills they needed? Were the success measures aligned with the new structure, or still based on a five day a week template?

Where TRS comes in

Designing flexible roles well is harder than designing traditional ones. There are more questions to answer, more structural decisions to get right, and more risk if you get it wrong. But at the end of the day, it’s increasingly the difference between attracting the candidates you want and watching them walk off to your competitors.

At TRS, we work with employers to design roles that work for both sides. We’ve placed candidates into part time, compressed week, school hours, job share, and hybrid arrangements across trades, manufacturing, logistics, construction, and engineering. We know which structures hold up and which ones quietly fall apart at month four.

If you’re thinking about your next hire and want to talk through how flexibility might fit, give us a call. The conversation is a lot more useful before you’ve written the job ad than after.

Balancing Baby and Recruitment: My Story as a Recruiter Heading into Maternity Leave